The state government has already spent hundreds of millions of
dollars on a $68 billion statewide bullet-train project that’s highly
unlikely to ever get built. As the cliché goes, when you’re in a hole,
stop digging. But even after two brutal court defeats on Monday, such
common sense is still AWOL within Gov. Jerry Brown’s administration.In
one decision, Sacramento Superior Court Judge Michael Kenny ruled that
the California High-Speed Rail Authority could not proceed with using
billions of dollars in bond funds to begin construction because it had
not credibly identified funding sources for the entire $31 billion it
will take to finish the 300-mile initial segment, nor had it completed
necessary environmental reviews for the segment. These requirements were
among the taxpayer protections written into law by California voters in
November 2008,deep groove ball bearing when
they voted narrowly for Proposition 1A to allow the state to issue
$9.95 billion in bonds as seed money for the project. Kenny said the
state must develop a plan that comports with these requirements.In a
second ruling, Kenny refused to validate a state committee’s decision to
allow the issuance of $8.6 billion in bonds for bullet-train
construction because it had offered no evidence of any kind that such a
move was “reasonable or necessary.Marble tiles”
“The court cannot conclude that this [approval of bonds without review]
is the result the voters intended,” he wrote.Kenny did not order all
work stopped.
The rail authority has been given more than $3
billion in unencumbered federal funds for the project by the Obama
administration. But he rejected arguments made by the Attorney General’s
Office that the Legislature — and not state law — had final say on how
state bonds were used.As a practical matter, this means construction
can’t start unless the state finds $25 billion or more in solid
financing — which is highly unlikely given a ban on revenue guarantees
to investors. Nor can it start until the state completes all
environmental reviews for the initial 300-mile segment — which could
take years.These are immense obstacles. Yet instead of acknowledging
their seriousness, rail authority board Chairman Dan Richard depicted
them as predictable “challenges,” and a spokeswoman said the authority
would proceed with its plans to seize land for the project in the
Central Valley via eminent domain.This is in keeping with Richard's
full-speed-ahead bravado. But is also unconscionable — disrupting the
lives and livelihoods of Central Valley residents for a project that is
now an extreme long shot solely to create an apparition of
progress.Before this happens, it’s time for a “have you no shame?”
intervention in Sacramento. If Jerry Brown won’t take Richard to the
woodshed, then it’s time for some senior Democratic leader to take Brown
to the woodshed.ntn bearingA
decade ago, when he was attorney general, Treasurer Bill Lockyer ripped
the “puke politics” of Gov. Gray Davis. Taking away folks’ homes and
farms for political theater is politics at its pukiest. In coming days
and weeks, we hope Lockyer, Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, Sen. Dianne Feinstein
or some Democrat of stature has the decency to make this point.
No comments:
Post a Comment